• Oisteink@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s still a misuse of the word - if your software needs testing it’s not a candidate you would release unless you’re a multi-billion gaming company or Cisco

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Production releases still need testing. There are always bugs you don’t know about hiding somewhere in projects or vast complexity.

      • Oisteink@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are, but if none are found it can be released - like apple and Microsoft sometimes does.

        It’s what you put in it I guess. For me that’s “Hopefully ready but it’s what we’re shipping in features and functionality”

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wiktionary: (software engineering) A version of a program that is nearly ready for release but may still have a few bugs; the status between beta version and release version.

      Oxford: a version of a product, especially computer software, that is fully developed and nearly ready to be made available to the public. It comes after the beta version.

      I couldn’t find more definitions from “big” dictionaries, but literally no definition I’ve seen agrees with you. I wonder why that is.