• Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s cool, it’s still significantly better than 4.

    However, 3 was the best one in my humble opinion.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      3 was awesome. 4 is a huge disappointment because it feels like it went backwards. Dated mechanics aren’t a big deal in a 20 year old game, but 4 really feels like a minor tweak of 2 rather than a game made this decade.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    That video explanation and demo preview is so well polished and audio corrected that I felt like it was an AI voice with an AI video generated image of the person.

    The online world is becoming a weird place.

    But now I’m also looking forward to see then renewal of an old game … this is amazing.

    • Gleddified@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      IMO we’re pushing it pretty hard now, if they keep pumping out civs we’ll be 60 before you know it. I can barely keep track of all of them as it is. I feel like it’d hurt the semi-casual MP scene if we have to memorise bonuses of so many civs.