• bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Zhang further stated that an immediate ceasefire was a “fundamental prerequisite” for “saving lives, expanding humanitarian access and preventing greater conflicts. The US draft on the contrary sets up preconditions for a ceasefire which is no different from giving a green light to continued killings which is unacceptable.”

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    So in case you are wondering if Russia and China were caring about the people in Gaza, this vote shows that they are clearly not. They’d rather take this opportunity that would see the US taking the most confrontantional stance against Israel since the start of the invasion into Gaza, to dunk on the US.

    • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wtf is the point of passing this bs watered down version? It’s basically a strongly worded letter if it’s not demanding an immediate ceasefire. It also has more bs like Israeli prisoners going free but no mention of any palestinians going free? It’s completely one sided.

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It calls for a ceasefire if Israeli hostages are released and for immediate aid to the people of Gaza. If the US starts off at A, support Israel unconditionally, and you start of at B, ceasefire now, and the US gets slowly pressured your way until ultimately, the US enters a resolution that is much closer to B than to A, you don’t stomp your foot and say ‘that’s not B!’ and reject it, if you really care about civilians in Gaza, who are starving right now, only in the hopes that in a few months time, the US might’ve fully moved over to B. When Israel has already invaded Rafah and many Gazans have starved.

        • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          How about Israel release the entire area of Gaza as a hostage first?

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            Why don’t you wish for unicorns while you’re at it? That’s about as likely to happen as Israel, after all this time, suddenly deciding to pull back from Gaza.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      US vetoed multiple actual ceasefire resolutions, this resolution did not call for a ceasefire and did not help people of Gaza in any way.

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Don’t mind me, just leaving this UN news report on the vetoed resolution here: https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147856

        The US-led draft, which took weeks to reach a vote, stated the “imperative” for “an immediate and sustained ceasefire to protect civilians on all sides”, facilitating “essential” aid delivery and supporting ongoing talks between Israel and Hamas militants to create a sustainable end to the hostilities, tied to the release of hostages.

        The vetoed draft would have made imperative an immediate and sustained ceasefire in Gaza, with an “urgent need to expand the flow of humanitarian assistance” to all civilians and lifting “all barriers” to delivering aid

        How exactly would’ve this bill ‘not helped in any way’?

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          How exactly would’ve this bill ‘not helped in any way’?

          The article in the submission explains that in detail. Maybe try reading it?

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ah yes, let’s classify calling for aid deliveries to the people of Gaza ‘not helping’, because not all demands are met. Fuck those starving people, we want all of our points met.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              US could literally tell Israel to open the border and let aid in any time. Instead, they send weapons to kill people while blocking serious ceasefire resolutions. Try putting a bit more effort into your trolling.

              • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                US could literally tell Israel to open the border and let aid in any time.

                But they won’t. End of story. What are you going to do about it? Get all the help for the people currently suffering that you can get, or stomp your foot while Gazans starve? I know what you’ve chosen.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  That’s right, they won’t and that makes US a direct participant in the genocide. End of story. They’re not trying to get help to people, they’re literally doing the opposite of that while doing these kinds stunts so that online trolls can pretend that they’re doing something positive.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      I swear the main purpose of this resolution—which should have been and was shot down—was to make us suffer tripe like this.

    • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      This just lets “israel” continue the genocide after getting only their hostages back (not the thousands of Palestinians they have hostage) and leaving Gaza with less options