• tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s worth mentioning that GIMP is mainly developed by two developers. If you wish for the development to be faster, you should consider donating.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      GIMP is an odd project, one that I’m not sure is actually being held back by money, considering they’ve been sitting on a donation of bitcoin since 2014 that now amounts to 1.3 million, and just… haven’t used it, at all?

      Krita seems like a more promising project, IMHO.

      • yistdaj@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I think it should be clarified that GIMP’s structure isn’t able to make use of donations to GIMP as a single entity. Edit: or at least wasn’t, I hear they can now.

        I agree that Krita is more promising though, I switched to Krita years ago and have never looked back.

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah, thank you for the info, I was not aware. I hope they’re able to put that money to good use now.

      • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Literally every meme I’ve ever made was done in GIMP. I can say that the software needs non-destructive editing that applies to transforming layers. So far there’s only non-destructive effects on the layers, but discarding 20 years of work because the software is not a 1:1 copy of Photoshop seems silly.