I don’t know where else to put this. I’m sorry if it’s in the wrong place and will move it if it’s not appropriate here.

Every time I read anything from so-called solarpunks, it reads like slightly left of centre ravings of doomsday preppers. They seem to love many of the same fascist talking points. For example, individualism self-sufficiency , which sounds a lot like the frontier cowboy fantasies of right-wing nutters. They promote what essentially is subsistence farming, which is a terrible way to live. There’s a reason this kind of shit leads to famine in developing countries. An almost enthusiastic fantasy surrounding primitism and the loss of technology. There are so many issues, I could go on. Unless I’m missing something (possible) I don’t see much appealing about solarpunk because it seems to have a delusional nostalgia for the “good old days”, much in the way conservativism does.

Is it really as crackpot as it sounds? If not, what am I missing?

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 个月前

    Wingnut paranoia

    Your ideas don’t have a monopoly on a more sustainable future

    So you’re saying they’re my ideas, and that their wing nut paranoid ideas. That’s an insult and an attribution

    • darkphotonstudio@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 个月前

      That wasn’t my intention and the quote is out of context (you left out “sounds like”) but if you want to be insulted, that’s your perogative .

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 个月前

        I think a reasonable interpretation of your previous comment, was that it was intended to be insulting, and combative. Perhaps I am mistaken, and I’m willing to entertain that… But that’s my reading

        Communication is not what is intended, it is what is perceived.