I’ve been working on converting my gaming PC to Linux for a few weeks, but everything is running, but it all is just a little jankier than I would like.

I have an 8th gen Intel i7 and an Rtx 2070, running Arch linux.

Sometimes I boot up and my mouse doesn’t work and I have to restart. Sometimes I launch games and they just don’t launch right.

It feels like I’m doing a lot of work for no benefit. In fact, Elden ring runs way worse on my Linux partition than my Windows partition.

I’ve tried GE proton, gamemode, steam compatibility, everything… I’m sorry but I’m going to have to stick with Windows for gaming.

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    5 months ago

    First of all nothing to apologize, no one should be forcing anyone to use any OS.

    Secondly, you shouldn’t start with Arch, it’s a very manual process that has several small things that can be done wrong. I recommend you try Mint, Pop or any other beginner friendly distro, you can still tinker and customize them as much as you want, but you will be starting from something that works instead of having to build a working system from the ground up without knowing what that looks like.

      • TeddE@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        5 months ago

        Obviously NixOS is the way to go for a gaming OS, just use the right flake and you’re all set!

        /s

  • mlg@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    5 months ago

    Arch Linux

    Unless you’re on a good downstream like SteamOS, I’d suggest switching to something stable cutting edge (Fedora or Nobara if you want to put in zero effort).

    Arch by itself will give you way the hell too many possible problems. You could waste hours on DKMS alone.

    Mint will also work, but it has the downside of having slower updates to software packages.

      • Para_lyzed@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        5 months ago

        Fedora is what I’d describe as cutting edge, but not bleeding edge. It’s still behind from source, and is semi-rolling release, so it’s further behind than Arch but way ahead of stable/fixed release distros like Debian

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zipEnglish
        1·
        5 months ago

        Its generally more up to date with newer standards and such than Debian, but it is by no means bleeding edge.

        Bleeding edge is generally bad unless you really need some specific thing for a specific reason.

        If your whole set up is bleeding edge then congrats, you are a basically alpha testing an OS.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    5 months ago

    Who the hell recommended Arch to you? Arch is for when you’ve been using Linux for a few years and have gotten bored waiting for the latest updates to hit your repos.

    • Jambalaya@lemmy.zipOPEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      I use Linux at work, so I am a least familiar with how to tinker with it, but it just can’t seem to find the right settings to get things running smoothly. I can’t imagine a different distro would be any different.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        5 months ago

        I can’t imagine a different distro would be any different.

        BZZZZZZZZZZZT I’m sorry but that answer was not correct. Next player!

        Seriously try some of the other distros and you’ll have a much more pleasant experience. I already recommended Tumbleweed in another reply but man, anything but Arch is gonna be an improvement for somebody trying to make the switch from Windows gaming for the first time.