Works really well, personally only tested on Linux, but I love it!

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s the clipboard, you shouldn’t put secure items on the clipboard generally speaking. (We all do it anyway)

        • Kalkaline @leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Password managers are the bees knees if you have to use a password, I do like the authenticator only logins especially if you have an obnoxious number of sites you have to login to. I will say though, that clipboards are tricky especially in an environment where VNC/Screen Connect etc are actively used. Screen Connect especially will happily grab the clipboard contents and share it with the other user.

          • delirious_owl@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Probably shouldn’t use software that will remotely log and upload things that you store to your keyboard. Should have a policy against that.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        that too, but not just that. how does access control work, how is memory safety around the receiving and authenticating code, is the traffic encrypted and how…because keystrokes, and I think mouse actions are also sensitive

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Looks like it’s also a variant of Synergy, so I guess it’s just the same. There’s a lot of different forks of it, I’m not sure which one is the ‘best’ these days.

        • fernandofig@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not a variant. Read their README. It IS Synergy, they’re renaming the open-source / community version to that, while Synergy will remain the commercial product built out of that.

          • Papamousse@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, again, I saw this, there is multiple fork… I’m still using the latest 2.4.0 from 2021, I’ll see if it’s compatible.

            • fernandofig@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Barrier has been abandoned quite awhile ago. Its successor is supposed to be InputLeap, and although their GitHub repo is very active, they have yet to make a release.

              I didn’t even know that Synergy provided a “community” version of their app until very recently. I’ve paid for a license many years ago, so I’ve been using their 1.1x versions, which for better or worse, are still maintained along with the 3.x branch (which I’ve tried using but could never make it work, which is for the best because the fact they pivoted their UI to electron-based also left a bad taste in my mouth).

              Edit: also, if I understand correctly, Synergy’s latest versions on the 1.x branch borrows a lot from InputLeap.