• brot@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Which is actually a really crap regulation as each city has to check all of their bicycle paths and allow S-Pedelecs. Which means that there are many cities which are simply not doing that.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Many/most urban city paths in Germany are already too crowded for S-Pedelecs which go at 45 km/h.

      For example, you would need to be able to safely overtake a slower bicycle which on most German bike lanes is not safely possible. And of course, it is a different thing for Netherlands bike infrastructure - but you also have much denser bike traffic there.

      • brot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The problem here is, that at least in Germany S-Pedelecs are not allowed on bicycle paths at all. Which makes city driving a nightmare and is also preventing S-Pedelecs on many other paths. Around here there are many paths through nature reserves and woodland, where it totally makes sense that motorcycles are banned, but since S-Pedelecs fall into that category, you are screwed.

        A regulation like “feel free to drive there, but do not even think about going faster than 25km/h” could work.

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The regulation is more ar less only intended for high speed tracks ("Radschnellwege") where it is sometimes suitable to allow 45 km/h fast bikes or bike streets (“Fahrradstraßen”) where the s-pelelecs then would have to obey to the 30 km/h limit, not for each and every small narrow bike lane.