Based dev and I wishlistrd that game because it looks fun and I want to support them for the response alone, but I think I kind of agree with that decision, or can at least see where it’s coming from. Disliking a game for its political message seems entirely valid to me, if someone made an otherwise amazing game but the message is “hitler was great actually”, I’d like to be able to negatively review that. And since it’s not review bombing but actual individual idiots, it shouldn’t have a big impact wrt to the ratio. If anything I read a review like that and become more interested in the game. Allowing it at least keeps them honest.
Though “it has muslims” as a negative review reason still seems like it should be removed just for being racist (or if i were to give the reviewer way more benefit of the doubt than they deserve, sounding racist. I guess in theory they could just not like religions in games, but let’s be real they’d love if it were christians instead).
Its a “valid,” review in that it does describe how they dont like the game and why, and hinestpy thats better than 90% of reviews. However, and this is a big however, racists should not get a pass and should be banned and removed for being racist. We should not brook these type of people and especially not give them a platform. It only makes things worse. Stamp the problem out with prejudice.
Yeah all nazis are fascist as they are defined by that.
What do all Muslims have in common?
I mean all branches, all backgrounds, all genders, in entire history.
What is something you can define all Muslims by? Mumins and munafiqs, sufis and maturidis, religious and non-religious, child and adult, Ahl al-Ra’y and Ahl al-Hadith, etc.
You can’t really classify people by something and then make assumptions about them based on something else.
That would be like republicans saying “I am not a Nazi because I am not german.”
Based dev and I wishlistrd that game because it looks fun and I want to support them for the response alone, but I think I kind of agree with that decision, or can at least see where it’s coming from. Disliking a game for its political message seems entirely valid to me, if someone made an otherwise amazing game but the message is “hitler was great actually”, I’d like to be able to negatively review that. And since it’s not review bombing but actual individual idiots, it shouldn’t have a big impact wrt to the ratio. If anything I read a review like that and become more interested in the game. Allowing it at least keeps them honest.
Though “it has muslims” as a negative review reason still seems like it should be removed just for being racist (or if i were to give the reviewer way more benefit of the doubt than they deserve, sounding racist. I guess in theory they could just not like religions in games, but let’s be real they’d love if it were christians instead).
Its a “valid,” review in that it does describe how they dont like the game and why, and hinestpy thats better than 90% of reviews. However, and this is a big however, racists should not get a pass and should be banned and removed for being racist. We should not brook these type of people and especially not give them a platform. It only makes things worse. Stamp the problem out with prejudice.
Problem is that “Hitler” is an individual while “Muslim” is multiple groups of people all with different views.
Also yeah it’s usually used as synonym for “brown people.”
So the hypothetical wouldn’t be okay if we changed hitler to nazis since that’s a group of hitlers.
Yeah all nazis are fascist as they are defined by that.
What do all Muslims have in common?
I mean all branches, all backgrounds, all genders, in entire history.
What is something you can define all Muslims by? Mumins and munafiqs, sufis and maturidis, religious and non-religious, child and adult, Ahl al-Ra’y and Ahl al-Hadith, etc.
You can’t really classify people by something and then make assumptions about them based on something else.
That would be like republicans saying “I am not a Nazi because I am not german.”