cannedtuna@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 天前Brought to you by the same people that told you not to believe everything you read on the internet and now only read click bait headlines from Fox or Breitbartlemmy.worldimagemessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down114
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imageBrought to you by the same people that told you not to believe everything you read on the internet and now only read click bait headlines from Fox or Breitbartlemmy.worldcannedtuna@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 天前message-square87linkfedilink
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·9 天前Wikipedia isn’t a valid source for academic research. For all other purposes it’s very useful and even in academia it’s often a good starting point.
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·9 天前One of the most important reasons to cite journal articles and books with an ISBN instead of web links never gets mentioned. Web links change all the time. Page numbers and paragraphs do not. Your sources shouldn’t die when AWS does a migration or a website changes its name.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 天前A good starting point maybe, but too many people also treat it as the end point, and as basically scripture in general
Wikipedia isn’t a valid source for academic research. For all other purposes it’s very useful and even in academia it’s often a good starting point.
One of the most important reasons to cite journal articles and books with an ISBN instead of web links never gets mentioned.
Web links change all the time. Page numbers and paragraphs do not. Your sources shouldn’t die when AWS does a migration or a website changes its name.
Doi.org?
A good starting point maybe, but too many people also treat it as the end point, and as basically scripture in general