

its not a claim, its asserted as a plausible explanation for facts
thats, uh, what a claim is. my bad.


its not a claim, its asserted as a plausible explanation for facts
thats, uh, what a claim is. my bad.
Don’t tell me how to live my life.


got one for dating apps?


It’s a bold new look.
You walked into the vegan sub and talked about enjoying the taste of meat. You came in here to start some shit, you don’t get to clutch your pearls when someone throws a colorful metaphor at you for your shitty behavior.


I see. Hm.


I meant the bounty. Militaries have, or are supposed to have, the ability to check that they won’t hit anything if they miss. Randoms shooting down drones for a bounty aren’t necessarily equipped or incentivised to check.


what goes up must come down, you do that and there’s potential to hit surrounding occupied areas.


Wow! I wouldn’t have expected anywhere near that disparity!
Edit: and thanks for taking the trouble to look it up, too. How did you find that? Was it written somewhere or did you have to do a calculation?


how much by mass?
Wetness is an illusion. An artificial category imposed on what we call reality by our minds. Which are also illusory. Everything is an illusion. It’s all as meaningful and purposeful as the patterns dust makes in a whirlwind. That’s all we are- dust in the wind. Everything is dust in the wind.