They also are basically always dripping pee wherever they go. Constantly. Like a faucet.

Can confirm.

Meta (Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp), X/Twitter, TikTok - all of these are fascist mouthpieces. Consider any information you gain through them to be propaganda.

“We got a report of a guy having assaulted someone here, you answered the door, so you’re under arrest”?

To be fair, the biggest mistake the guy made was answering the door at all.

I said “might.” Not “would.”

You’re free to take whatever tone you want. Tone aside, I see that all you ever really do is rant about “libs” and blame everyone for fascism except fascists.

This does not make sense.

Your tone definitely makes me want to take your advice.

Whatever you need to think to excuse fascists for being fascists, I guess.

This is what SCOTUS found:

“The court also held that the Fifth Amendment could allow a suspect to refuse to give the suspect’s name if he or she articulated a reasonable belief that giving the name could be incriminating.”

In the situation that played out in the clip, had that been in the US,

… it might be within the guy’s 5th Amendment rights to refuse to identify himself.

Whatever you need to think to excuse fascists for being fascists, I guess.

So you’re mad at Democrats for not being fascist enough?

I have to say it again:

• Fascists promise to do fascist things
• Americans elect fascists
• Fascists do fascist things
• HOW COULD DEMOCRATS DO THIS???

In the US, that would be alright except when he refused to tell them who he was.

More generally, this depends heavily on the details of the interaction, and the US state where the interaction was taking place.

In the “I don’t answer questions” clip, if it were in the US, the police probably did have enough to arrest the guy, however “The court also held that the Fifth Amendment could allow a suspect to refuse to give the suspect’s name if he or she articulated a reasonable belief that giving the name could be incriminating.” Since the officers were asking for a specifically named person, it might be within the guy’s 5th Amendment rights to refuse to identify himself. Would his not identifying himself as the person they were looking for make it so they couldn’t (shouldn’t) arrest him? Possibly, since they’re looking for someone with a specific name, and they don’t know that that guy is named that.

Of course, you might beat the rap, but you can’t beat the ride.

When I did my five lines, recursively opening frames inside frames ad infinitum, it would crash browsers of the time in a matter of twenty seconds.

Preppers are brimming with smug satisfaction.

I’m sure the French were asking this exact question in 1788.

The modern equivalent of making a page that loads in two frames, left and right, which each load in two frames, top and bottom, which each load in two frames, left and right …

As I recall, this was five lines of HTML.

Or the Russians had AI building their cars in the 80s.

MoooOOOOOMMMMMM! Deceptichum is teasing me!

Who holds soup like that?