

that is axiomatically incorrect. smuggling is if they were to still trade via back channels directly with the sanctioning country. cf: us doing iran contra lol.


that is axiomatically incorrect. smuggling is if they were to still trade via back channels directly with the sanctioning country. cf: us doing iran contra lol.


this is key to tell the folks who think the constitution matters. they’re called “amendments” for a reason lol.


is it really “smuggling” if the sanctions are horseshit anyway?

do you not know about the history of the nation of South Africa? Or not know that it is a nation at all?


no no you had a popular role and people recognize you and you never again have to worry about money. must he hard.
that was cmos? shit it looked like 90’s era winamp. trying to kick some llama ass.
i am indeed anti capitalist. the thing is - a state has laws already for breaking down systems of religious control through child safety laws. yet here it’s done via “policy”. why?
i never said if i think it is bad or good. just that a nation state should not be legislating it via side channel controls like school “policy” but instead, if care was had, through child laws.
if $reason is from $religion - then state has no say outside of other existing laws. if the state was “truly” concerned DCF would be called. we already have child safety laws. why have they used those laws? because it’s about intimidation and control instead.
a school should have zero say in what parts of a person’s faith is valid or not unless they are going to use existing mandatory reporting laws. not stupid control via things like dress codes because it’s not even a dog whistle at this point.
from a personal choice? sure. you can be a douche to these peoples.
but if my religion says “no beards” and a gov agency say “must beards” … what right does a gov have in controlling my choice? completely inappropriate.


“clearly not permitted to do” - boi there is a whole pretend constitution of shit these nazis are not permitted to do and they are doing it. because they are inhumane terrorists.
my head-canon says a time machine’s only legal use is going to be to go back in time and smack mothers for raising road rage douchebags but… this may also suffice.


the US pretending to give citizenship or safety for “help” is a tale as old as time.


my neighbors are refugees from ukraine. while personally they are douchebags whose love of small engines and car repair means the alley between our house (my bedroom) and their apartment contains a tire machine, air compressor, and eight snow blowers… two motorcycles on the porch and four cars in a 2 car driveway… I worry they’ll get booted back to ukraine and war if trumps nonsense pulls the rug from under them.


i hope it means you the US collapses, we get invaded, or coup’d, and start to feel the pressure we put on the rest of the world.
“if systems needed for life, health, housing, education, and food were not allowed to profit and shareholders were held criminally responsible should they profit. “
remember: the US if it wants a war will straight lie and claim to have been shot. The Gulf of Tonkin is a very real lie that got us “into” Vietnam so we can do a very profitable series of war crimes there.