I think the writers are using that kind of language to show the personality of that character. He doesn’t want to admit (or can’t see/believe) his girlfriend left him because he was a bad partner, and so explains it by saying she became a lesbian. By doing this he absolves himself of any blame, fault, or responsibility for the relationship failing.
Printers and printer ink
They did see the criticism; in fact a lot of it was aimed directly at them. But they thought that they were right.
A spokesperson told Bloomberg that the fee will “help cover the costs of running a separate infrastructure and measuring its effectiveness.” So a significant part of the fee is to pay for measuring it? What’s that phrase about the bureaucracy expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy again…?
I did use the cross-post feature. Many apps do not recognise or acknowledge cross-posting yet which might explain why this article may have appeared multiple times for you.
I did use the cross-post feature. Many apps do not recognise or acknowledge cross-posting yet which might explain why this article may have appeared multiple times for you.
I did use the cross-post feature. Many apps do not recognise or acknowledge cross-posting yet which might explain why this article may have appeared multiple times for you.
Yes, weirdly the very same website wrote about it back then (https://www.iflscience.com/fully-intact-dinosaur-embryo-found-inside-fossilized-egg-62004). I’m not sure what inspired another article now.
This was originally published in 2021 so I wonder why it has a new article.
https://www.iflscience.com/fully-intact-dinosaur-embryo-found-inside-fossilized-egg-62004
The source code of the original game was leaked last year.
This exact article was posted here 16 hours ago: https://lemmy.world/post/3034605
This bot should see when a link has already been posted and not duplicate it. Similarly, some kind of automod should prevent the same article being posted twice.
I should have commented in the post that it is not my view and is supposed to initiate discussion. I’ve edited the original post with the following question:
While questioning scientific practices has led to some significant improvements despite heavy criticism at the time, how do we today justify dismissing unpopular/uncomfortable ideas while continuing to make scientific progress?
Thanks! This definitely puts the whole situation in a bit different light, doesn’t it.
Do you have a source for this?
As you’ve been very diligent reporting errors and suggesting changes to map data, have you ever considered contributing to OpenStreetMap? You might like helping by using the app Every Door on iOS, for example.
If they’re cross-posted they’ll show up only once (though not all apps support this feature yet). I cross-post when I know something is especially relevant to multiple communities. If I don’t then someone else will, either not cross-posting or using a different source, meaning it will definitely show up multiple times to people.
Huh?
Can you provide more context? Maybe the posts that are being linked to in that screenshot?
This was discussed on both communities you posted this two five days ago:
https://yiffit.net/post/884578
https://yiffit.net/post/884575
(Sorry for the yiffit links - Lemmy still does not have server-neutral ways to link to posts)
What are these minimal fees, and what are they for? I’m always skeptical of these online learning providers that imply they are free but don’t quite say as much.