• Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There is a lot about this that is nuts, but one thing that really jumps out at me.

    It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

    But with this I have to ask: are Biden and Harris assisting with a plan that is clearly intended to cost Harris the election?

    I want to say that they surely must’ve told Israel not to launch anything before election day. But based in their actions so far, it doesn’t seem like they’re imposing a “no election interference against us personally” requirement as a condition of their assistance.

    I guess we’ll see.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

      Do you realize that israel government is waging war only because they are backed by USA?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Israel–Hamas_war

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Yes, and zios will be even more backed by Trump (supposedly).

        It’s not even a hidden thing. Yahoo wants Trump. Grift recognize grift.

    • Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      136
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Their messaging so far to Israel has been “do whatever the fuck you want, 💰💰”

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The insanity is not that it is Republicans or Democrats

      The insane part is that America is just sleep walking straight into a war that will probably escalate into something much bigger and no one wants to do anything about it.

      God help us all

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        As every other time the billions the government spend in propaganda are paying off.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Make me homelander and I’d shut this shit down in a heartbeat. Until such time best I got is a pencil check in a box on paper.

          • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Maybe you can.
            All the money I’d earmarked for kung fu lessons and a collection of random lethal weapons wound up going into pet care and hobbies. Besides, I definitely don’t have plot armor. I’d get popped by some junior security mail cop. They probably wouldn’t even have to shoot me. They’d run me over with their Segway, I’d fall, crack my head open, and they’d put a little skull and crossbones sticker on their scooter, like a WWII fighter pilot.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If Harris is in on a plan to strike Iran it wouldn’t cost her the election in the US. All they have to do is say, “We received credible intelligence that Iran had decided to sprint for a nuclear warhead. We had to act in a timely manner.”

      What would cost her the election is if an American soldier dies to an Iranian missile and Biden/Harris doesn’t immediately go hard on Iran. Which makes this a ridiculously irresponsible move by Biden.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        She most likely was in the room when Biden authorized the troops you know. She is very much on the same page as Biden on this.

        Sucks you guys don’t have any other option.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              44 minutes ago

              Which to this point has been attempts at a cease fire and offshore missile defense help. Putting troops under Iranian missiles is a massive departure from the past year.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              45 minutes ago

              I have. She generally tries to walk a line between fully pro Israel and neutrality.

          • riodoro1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            She did say she supports Bidens stance on Israel and that israel has the right to murder innocent children protect itself.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              43 minutes ago

              Of the two she’s the one whose had statements about Israel needing to respect international law. So there’s no evidence she believes Israel should be allowed to conduct a genocide.

            • thejml@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              To be fair I think most people think it (and other countries) should be able to defend itself… it’s just that they went from defense to all out genocide like a year ago.

              The current party doesn’t know where that line is while the other party wants them to “finish the job”.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        15 hours ago

        This is a weird thing to say, but I actually don’t think that there’s any indication that Harris or Trump would do anything substantially different with regard to Israel, but the biggest change is that if Trump wins, I suspect that coverage of this will disappear behind all the coverage of his domestic chaos. At least if Harris is president I think there is a chance we see the press maintain a modicrum of interest in covering this.

        Either way, words can’t describe my anger that Harris appears to be prepared to throw the election over her support for genocide. It is an unreal situation to watch.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Trump in charge tends to highlight problems not burry them. Like how immigration and the border camps were a huge story, then Biden got elected, kept all the same staff and same facilities and suddenly the border camps weren’t a problem and we went further rightward on immigration. People stop paying attention when Democrats win, that’s how they burry stories, and that’s why the media loves Trump, because hes the one who generates the clicks and engagement they track.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Zionism is an anti-semitic ideology. It was concocted by atheist colonizers, not religious leaders. The goals are colonial, not religious. Most importantly zios commit these crimes while claiming to be the only true jews. This is extremely anti-semitic.

            So it’s no surprise that they’ve collaborated with literal nazis before WW2. And it’s no surprise that they continue to collaborate with racists and fascists all over the planet. In the usa the vast majority of zionists are christians that are generally very anti-semitic. They want jews to take over palestine so doomsday will come and kill the jews! These are the allies of zionism smh.

            • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 minutes ago

              Zionism is an anti-semitic ideology.

              A significant number of jews across the globe say otherwise. The very foundation of your argument is self serving propoganda. And I didnt read past that.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            No intelligent person should vote for a party supporting a genocide either. Israel government is finishing the job already.

            • Kalysta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Ok. But either Harris or Trump WILL be our next president with how fucked up our election system is.

              Who would you rather fight on this? A run of the mill democrat, or a literal nazi? We’re choosing our opponent, it’s the only choice we get.

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 minutes ago

                Don’t support any of them and use your energies somewhere else, you said yourself that the system is fucked up

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            14 hours ago

            So the one says it out loud, the other just keeps the intention quiet.

            Both are equally sending weapons.

            However with Trump we saw that he pulled American soldiers out of the region and he is much more unstable. So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              14 hours ago

              So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

              That would require him to give a shit about the soldiers dying to make a change. His history says the exact opposite of that. Soldiers dying would do absolutely nothing towards whether he changes anything.

              • Saleh@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Trump pulled most troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Sure he doesnt care about the soldiers life, but he isnt committed to being a war hawk. He just does random stuff.

                • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  26
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  The troop withdrawal was already being worked before Trump even started campaigning. He just decided to speed it up dramatically so he could say he achieved something, and promised a deadline that was unattainable while doing it well. It’s not random, it’s narcissism at the expense of everything else, including the country.

                  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    The troop withdrawal was already being worked before Trump even started campaigning.

                    Yeah it was in the works for like 20 years lol.

        • Zexks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’ll disappear by him shutting down all news organizations and outlawing any dissenting opinions. He’s straight up said it. There is no functional difference on this issues between them. It’s the ancillary consequences trump will impose on everyone that is why he should be fired into the sun as an example.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Trump would tell Netanyahu to nuke the place and he’d fucking do it. It would be a catastrophe the likes of which we haven’t seen since WWII.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      if they money you get from AIPAC is more than the money you get as US presidency and without the headache of being president, I wounder if Kamala care enough to be a president.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It feels like they are totally beholden to Israel.

      If they push back hard, they alienate swing voters who like Israel from the old days, aka apocalypse.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        This is actually a persistent myth: there is no evidence that they are beholden to a constituency that would punish them for any actions that curtail Israel.

        Israel’s actions are wildly unpopular across the electorate. They are unpopular with nearly all Democrats as well as most independents and a very large plurally of Republicans. I have seen numerous polls that show that there is a very significant number of voters that Harris is losing over this, and I have seen absolutely nothing to indicate that there is any measurable cost to her speaking out against Israel at all. Which is really sad. Because it means that this is absolutely a moral choice on her part. This is not an electoral choice at all.

        https://truthout.org/articles/poll-endorsing-israel-arms-embargo-would-boost-harriss-support-to-49-percent/

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I am not religious so I don’t know the details but I have a friend who is very religious and refuses to vote for Trump again. He hates Harris but won’t give me a reason. When I have brought up the Israel stuff he immediately jumps to a very, holy land, must support and defend at any cost mentality. He would never vote Democrat but it makes me wonder how pervasive this weird fairy tale attachment exists throughout the voting base.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        A majority of Americans are against the action in Gaza. It is a popular opinion not to support it, unless you’re a major donor.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          So in the last few weeks, Biden can pull support as much as possible basically giving Bibi the finger. Any funding that dries up is unlikely to have more of an effect than pulling support. This helps Harris win. Then she can re-woo them over the next 4 years.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          A majority of those who actually turn out to vote are pro Israel (and no, people under 35 don’t vote in other countries where they have more options, so cut the “they don’t vote because of the support for Israel” bullshit, they don’t vote because they’re young and don’t care)

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Okay, well the Harris campaign can continue claiming that the reason she’s down in the polls in Michigan has nothing to do with Gaza.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Perhaps if he does that, then Joe and Harris will be forced to materially change their tune and take some real action in an attempt to save the elction.