what being rich does to a mf

  • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s a standard disinfection chemical that prevents bacteria from growing in the pipes? Pretty much all tap water have it. Bacteria in the drinking water is way worse than a miniscule amount of chlorine, just ask 18th century London.

    • guojing@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is my understanding that chlorine is only used temporarily, when there is a problem with bacteria in that region. I found the site below which seems to support this. In any case, wouldnt you be able to smell and taste chlorine?

      https://www.lenntech.es/procesos/desinfeccion/reglamento-de-la-ue/regulacion-desinfeccion-agua-eu.htm

      In Europe, other alternative disinfectants are currently used for drinking water disinfection (table 1). France, for example, mainly uses ozone which was introduced in 1906 as a water disinfection agent. Italy and Germany use ozone and chlorine dioxide as primary oxidants and disinfectants. England is one of the few European countries that use chloramines as a residual disinfectant in the distribution network and the disposal of disinfection by-products. Finland, Spain and Sweden use chloramines for disinfection only occasionally.

      @sexy_peach@feddit.de @lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.net