• nekandro@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    If Sweden had found Russia at fault, you’d think they would be shouting it from the rooftops.

  • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The question of jurisdiction was more complicated than where the crime had been committed.

    So… The US did it.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ukraine actually did it, but there’s no chance they’d do that without the US giving the go-ahead.

      • CascadeOfLight [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago
        No, it was definitely straight up the US. Ignore any bullshit about yachts and Ukrainian divers.

        Here is the USS Kearsage - one of the only ships in the world with a moon pool that would allow divers to operate at the pipeline’s depth - leaving after “NATO exercises” in the area of the pipeline five days before it exploded

        Here is a USN Boeing P-8A Anti-Submarine plane - one of the only planes in the world that can generate a radio pulse capable of reaching to the depth of the pipeline - flying along the length of the pipeline almost exactly 24 hours before it exploded

        Here is President of the United States Joseph Robinette Biden, stating that the Nord Stream 2 project - which competes with US LNG sales to Europe - will not be allowed to continue; just out of frame is Chancellor of Germany Olaf Scholz, who offers no form of contradiction or rebuttal

        • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, that US basically owns germany since WW2… has a basis with privileges like an embassy for near east espionage in g… has intelligence programs where g would like to be a closer partner…

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not disputing you but very interested in reading more and sources - I always was very skeptical the volunteer Ukrainian saboteurs angle

            • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Thanks for linking, but while there’s smoke and circumstance, it’s not a fire imo. Anonymous source, not sources.

              And Hersh seems to have fallen from the tightrope of critical analysis and skepticism, into acceptance of conspiratorial narratives from shaky actors.

              • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                His reporting has always relied on anonymous sources, and has always panned out in the long run. Nothing’s changed, we’re just not far enough removed from the war in Syria for the propaganda to lose control of the narrative in the west.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        From what I have heard it is actually really hard to do, and only a few countries have the capabilities and equipment.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          The propaganda says the Russians did it (which is ridiculous, it’s their own pipeline, and they could just shut it down on their end if they wanted to). Either way, there’s no way the US didn’t at least consent to it, and yeah, most likely was more directly involved in it.

          • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            Propaganda says both: first that Russia did it, then that Ukraine did it. The former is insulting stupid and the second is more subtle but still makes no logistical sense, as Ukraine lacks the specialized equipment and personnel required. The “Ukraine did it” narrative is one that’s still safer for the NATO bloc group that certainly did it, as even if they acknowledge it as true (which they don’t need to and have avoided doing), it’s easy to brush under the rug as Good Slava Ukraini Resistance.

            This is why these countries doing investigations are mum. They know neither narrative is true.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Lack of any reaction from Germany after the Ukraine version was announced is very telling. You would think they would at least consider to stop gutting their own country to help a country that supposedly did such thing, but nothing happened at all.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The war hawks answer would be so that we can economically separate russia-germany so that germany is more willing to go against russia. If Germany is dependent on gas from Russia they are less willing to risk their relationship.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        At the time, Germany was on the fence about sanctions because they were getting gas via the Nordstream from Russia and didn’t want to endanger that. Sudden, completely unexpected lack of gas from Russia = no impediment to backing sanctions. And that’s how it turned out.

  • ItsAFake@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sweden Closes Investigation of Pipeline Blasts, but Stays Silent on Cause

    Because it’s Cthulhu that did it.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why is is so hard to believe that the US blew up the pipeline? They have the capability, the motivation, and they will face absolutely no consequences from doing it. Like how is this even a question?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Believing that means having to accept that the whole western narrative in utter bullshit. NATO isn’t an alliance of nations that protect each other, it’s a protection racket that US runs to subjugate Europe.

  • arymandias@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah let’s not reflect or even think about the fact that Germanys economy has possibly been torpedoed with the go-ahead from, or directly by, its biggest ally.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Man I almost want to go back to reddit and smack every stupid user who exclaimed it was Russia the moment it happened with insane levels of an alibi.

    “uM AKshUlLy, THeY blEw iT uP So tHeRd be OnLy oNe PiPElInE fOr eURoPe”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    After investigators delved into a series of undersea explosions that blew apart the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines linking Russia to Western Europe in fall 2022, intelligence agencies came to a general agreement: The evidence pointed toward pro-Ukraine forces, even if the question of who might have been directing them remained a mystery.

    It even refused to team up with its closest neighbors, Denmark and Germany, a sign of how nervous the issue was making officials in Stockholm at a moment when it is still maneuvering for acceptance into the NATO military alliance.

    In an email Wednesday, Mr. Ljungquvist, the national security prosecutor who made the decision to close Sweden’s investigation, said the question of jurisdiction was more complicated than where the crime had been committed.

    Mr. Ljungqvist declined to say more, citing continued confidentiality in the case, which Sweden has the ability to revive, he said, as well as cooperation with German authorities in their investigation into the Nord Stream sabotage.

    “The Swedish armed forces continue to monitor the situation in the Baltic and other areas near Sweden,’’ Mr. Adamsson added on Wednesday, “in close cooperation with our international partners, soon allied, we hope.”

    The crime scene, along the floor of the Baltic Sea, provided little concrete evidence, something the Swedish authorities acknowledged in the early months of the investigation even as they closely guarded their inquiry.


    The original article contains 1,037 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    It was a Ukrainian mission directed by the USA. Before you downvote do even a basic amount of research. There was a great finding recently that tracked down the who and the how. A chartered yacht with 6 Ukrainian special forces planted the charges and it’s not an unknown anymore. They used fake passports, left out of Rostock Germany, and Germany traced it. They found the people via camera and entry. They found the yacht itself still with explosive residue on it.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-ukraine-russia/

    https://apnews.com/article/nord-stream-pipeline-attack-russia-investigation-4b7cb8117f420985b0d887117eebd786

    • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ah yes, the ever so trustworthy US State Department and intelligence services scribe the Washington Post. They’re definitely not throwing a smokescreen.

      “We’ve investigated ourselves of any wrongdoing, and while we can’t credibly deny that we suggested blowing up the pipeline and really wanted the pipeline blown up, we definitely didn’t touch the actual explosives!”