It used to be you could find a box of photos or keepsakes that you inherited to look back on how things were or when you were a kid. Now, most of that is stored on phones, and most parents probably don’t think to share or save them in a way to be passed down in the future.

  • webp@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Eventually everything and everyone we have ever known will be lost to time.

  • devaly@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I mean, most people don’t ever look back at the photos they take. Phones have made photos almost valueless.

    • jarvis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yep. An archive of grandma’s old phone photos will just be pics of casseroles, receipts, and questionably shaped moles.

    • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah all the phone pictures I’ve got backed up I’ve hardly every looked up again, I think the fact that film cameras limited the number of pictures you can take and you had to develop them means those picture books automatically became more valuable

      • ChexMax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        My parents were early adopters of digital photos, but also took a bunch on film and have scanned them. We have something around 20,000 photos. My parents display them on a screen in the living room and it’s awesome. We’re often mesmerized for dozens of minutes just watching and talking about the memories, and it’s a great way to connect with my parents now that we’re all adults, and really see the work they put in to give us a magical childhood. Before the physical photos were digitized we rarely flipped through the books if it wasn’t for a school project or something

        • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Before the physical photos were digitized…

          Not sure about you but in my house we had a photo wall where the best memories were and the books just held the “other photos” that also told the story. Most of my books from my parents were smaller and less memorable things like parties, fireworks, camping… but the shot of me scoring a goal, my sisters in a pyramid, that year we all dressed as scooby and gang…that was on the wall and now of course, on our digital frames we all own.

          I’ll agree the value of a photo goes down when you can take 200 in a minute, but the memories we missed because we had to save the other 20 shots left… didn’t make those memories priceless.

          Also people, back that shit up. When my kids turned 18 I shared a drive with them of all their younger years and have a digital executor for when I die who knows where the pics are (and what to delete 😏)

        • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I guess those digital picture frames can be useful if setup correctly, but I’d have to go and filter the actual good photos from my big pile of random pictures

          • OS2Warp@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yes; that’s what happened before digital photos. They were called “photo albums” and you only put the good pictures in them (while arching or throwing out the rest).

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    A drop in the bucket compared to those that were never taken at all in the last 4,000 years of civilization before the picture boxes came to be.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 days ago

    As someone who had to go through my mother’s and grandmother’s boxes of photo albums after they died, I can tell you that what people should be doing now is backing up select photos AND adding a full description in the files metadata. The vast majority of the photos in my mother’s and grandmother’s albums meant nothing to me because the context and history of those photos died with them.

    Aside from adding metadata for those you leave behind, you should make it a personal habit to go through you own old photos you have backed up. Those photos true value is not as a legacy but as means to remember as you get older. Life is long (hopefully). The amount of life you forget is staggering when you remember it.

    • zackhow@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      This here. Another thing to do is if you are taking video of family moments, narrate in the background what’s been going on for the past few days or a week. It adds additional context that is invaluable and would most likely be lost to even the person filming.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Fwiw I’ve found digikam to be a very nice tool to help with editing and writing metadata directly to photos.

      It’s Foss and available for all OSs. Mainly helps because you can point it to a directory and highlight many photos and tag the same person, etc etc. It’ll keep a list of tags to add as well. Unreal for the price of free but recommend donating of course.

  • fdnomad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 days ago

    How many pictures are lost because nobody ever looks at any of the 1000000 pictures they’ve taken?

    • Kjell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think you are right, they are all stored somewhere and might even have back-up. But at some point of time it will be way to many photos to go through in order to pick those that are worth saving. And then all photos might be deleted/lost.

    • radiofreebc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I had over 100k photos, and took a year to go through them. I built a filter for adobe lightroom and set it to filter photos by day of the year…and then, every day i would go through the photos i took on that day (over the last 26 years). I got through all my photos in a year, and never had to look over more than a couple hundred every day.

  • dasrael@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Very few really care about all of the data you’re producing over your lifetime. How many times have you taken serious efforts to go to the city archives, or read through inherited documents and photos, etc…?? Are you doing anything with them or just sitting on them?? Flicked through it once? Fun.

    Now with all of the bulk data we produce what are future gens gonna do with it? Prolly dump it into an AI to summarize and puke out into some trite little video memoir… That’s it, your life reduced to a twenty second collage for social clout.

    If you set out to fight entropy, you’re not gonna win.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Pretty much. I’m a data hoarder, to a degree. My homebuilt, Ship of Theseus NAS is about 15 years old, and it contains data going back over 20. I save everything I produce.

      I figure that one day, this data of mine will be fed into a system for future use, in the vein of how they construct people in the Star Trek Holodeck. So, I feel it’s up to me to curate that data, and be sure it’s accurate and reflects who I am.

      These days it’s obvious that it will eventually be turned into training data for an LLM, but then at least, my data will have some structure and personality to it. Maybe someday a joke will be cracked for someone that came from a pattern I established. Probably not, but one can dream.

      • dasrael@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Fair enough, I like your way of thinking. I keep a lot of data too, even though I don’t have the same hope as you do… Oh well, not like it can hurt anything.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        For a long time, when I’d replace a computer the new one’s hard drive would be so much bigger than the old one I would just copy the old computer’s entire drive into a folder of the new one - I think I did this at least four times before I decided that I almost never looked back into those older folders and found anything valuable.

        I looked back 15 years like that once and found: clip art, and banner printing software for a printer I threw out 14 years earlier.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    when my wife died, i was 32. the kids were 7, 8, and 10. there are tons of physical pics. but looking back at pics from almost 20 years ago now… sure i am gonna send each kid a usb key but… if i lost them i still have my memories. i wish however i took more video. i miss her voice. i am sure the kids do too.

    but if i lost the media, frankly whatever. i already feel the loss daily anyway so … 🤷‍♀️

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Memories fade though. Looking through old photos can help keep them alive. Especially when you’ve lost someone. Believe me I know.

      Old photos are something people don’t always realize are important and special until years later.

  • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Around a year ago, my dad went on a fishing trip with a friend, and his kayak flipped over due to how turbulent the conditions were, and due to that he lost his phone (which was in a waterproof pouch) in the ocean, which had likely multiple thousand family photos that weren’t backed up at all. The friend he was with decided to go diving in that area to try find it, but never did despite how calm the water had been after that incident.

    Now he backs his photos up from his new phone to Google drive, however I’m not sure whether he’s actually checked if it’s syncing or not.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Mike Birbiglia (comedian if you haven’t heard of him) said his now wife’s phone fell out of her pocket and into a river from a bridge the first time they kissed. She’s a poet and she wrote a poem about how she still gets prank calls from fish

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      don’t worry, google and facebook still has your photos their properties you and your friends have uploaded

    • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean in 2 or 3 generations noone is going to care about your personal photos anyway. Realistically probably not even that long. How many times have you sat down to look at photos of your parents or grandparents as anything more than a passing curiosity? People don’t even look at their own pictures. My sister just got married and her wedding package comes with like 1600 photos and a 2 hour video. Aside from when they first get them back I’d be willing to bet they never look back at 99% of those.

        • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          I learnt this after spending an entire day at a museum and taking loads of pictures. Then realised I am never going to look at any of these. So I stopped doing it. Why look at life through my phone when it is in front of me?

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            Conversely, I went to a place where my partner and I could hang out with, feed, pet, and snuggle heaps of animals we had never seen up close in real life—kangaroos, capybaras, porcupines (I was so scared but they were SOOOO sweet and loving!), baby binturong (we both cried, they climbed allll over us, my favorites easily), various reptiles, and way more. I was definitely in the moment but I did take oodles of photographs and videos. I look at them alllll the time. I am so happy I have photos and videos of that experience, I would regret so much if I didn’t!

        • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          How much time do you spend looking through them? Do you go through your entire collection, even the oldest ones regularly? Besides which, I agree that personal photos are valuable to the person, but unless something really fucking crazy happens in your life, nobody else really cares about your photos. Your kids might, your grandkids probably won’t, and your great grandkids probably won’t. And anyone further removed than that definitely wont. The post wasn’t about taking pictures, it’s about wanting to save them for ever

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            For the most part, iOS does a fantastic job of bringing up old photos I haven’t seen in a long time just on my Home Screen. I can click in, look at a few, think about those times, and then jump to the next thing I was doing. So some weeks it’s looking every day or two while other weeks less.

            I agree that most people probably won’t ever look at their grandparents photos, but maybe that’s because they weren’t good photos? Like someone else said, context is important so marking things that happened makes them more valuable.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, when my father died, there were a ton of old family photos, some were his, but others came from his parents or maybe even older than that. They were interesting to look through but no one really wanted them. I took some of them but they mostly just sit in a box now. Highly doubt my daughter will want them when I’m done, though maybe she will.

        Memories are nice when looking through them, but it’s not like I’m often worrying about things I don’t remember without a reminder.

        Though I should take more pictures of and with my daughter so she can have some memories. But I rarely even think about pulling out a camera most of the time.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        Which paper photo is going to last that long? Keeping personal data for that long requires an unlikely amount of continuous effort.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Being realistic, Ente stands the best chance for realistic photo storage

        Great prices and backed up in nuclear bunker and two other locations

        Has legacy/death hand over features

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          i was thinking about that too. have just read what they offer for another thread, and something is weird. is it correct that for free accounts they allow a year of inactivity before getting deleted, but if you don’t pay anymore and you use more than the free storage, they will delete your account after 30 days of missed payment?

          and whats with the legacy kit feature? it has an option for a 30 day waiting period. but how does that pair with account deletion shortly after missing the payments?

  • mangobanana@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    After my dad died I made a photo board for his memorial, it’s so weird because there was maybe 100 or 150 of photos of his entire LIFE. Both my parents hated getting their pictures taken, and no way were you taking a video of them. It’s sad I don’t have videos of my dad. I’m trying to take more of my mom now but it has to be stealthy

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    We had a house fire.

    Several pictures saved from the fire are forever stuck to the glass from the frame where they were, forever behind a smoky glass front.

    Other photos didn’t survive the fire or the firehouses.

    No one backed up their Polaroids or instamatic shots.

  • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I reccommend, and am certain many parents already do, to print the good photos and put them in a book.

    Back your stuff up is good advice, in case the worst happens, but nothing beats physical books your kids can look through.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      I bought one of those photo printers for this exact reason. Every once in a while, I’ll print some favorites and put them up in the house and in a photo book. It’s really nice to see them in physical form and not in my phone!

      I’ve also given friends copies of group photos as gifts!

    • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Better yet, back up to your computer, that is backed up to an external hard drive, that is copied to a trustworthy cloud somewhere. Always good to have duplicates should something happen.

      I lost about 12 years of pictures after getting rid of OneDrive (getting rid of Microsoft cuz I maxed out the 1TB anyway), and no joke a few weeks later on my personal server, 4 out of 8 hard drives failed. Thinking it was my raid card, I replaced them, couldn’t get it to function. Apparently a storm that we had fried some components and not others, and I swear I had duplicates on some old offline drives, so when I installed those to restore, I did not have everything. Crushed my heart!! I bought a bunch of large flash drives specifically for photos and videos, and started to back up to those for historical purposes.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Just beware that flash drives are not meant for long term storage. Mechanical HDDs are the best of the regular storage drives.

        • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          The best is to truly keep multiples. But flash storage would be more resilient and durable. Mechanical is susceptible to mechanical failure, impact, electrical shortages, etc. Both affected by heat, but if both were in a safe, my money is on flash storage if it were the only option.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            flash loses charge from the cells. hard drives are mechanical, but they loose the magnetic charge at a significantly slower rate (or I should say, flash memory loses it faster).

            but in both cases the files are better to be scrubbed regularly. zfs can do this with little effort, but creating once and then rechecking a checksum file could also have the same effect. gives the drive a chance to recognize and renew weak charges. I don’t think flash drives and sd cards have such built-in functionality, so maybe have 2 partitions and copy the whole contents in a direction, overwriting data, next time the other direction. but always check the checksums before any such copy.

            • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Dude we didn’t come here to argue partition formatting lmao. Cool ZFS is good. But limited to a handful of Linux distros on a computer (not phone) and definitely not for the average Joe* to figure out how to use.

              • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                dude cool down with your tone and downvotes, this is not reddit. if you reread my comment, the zfs part and the partitioning part are independent possibilities. you don’t need partitions for zfs. the 2 partition way is for when you don’t have zfs for whatever reason. you will probably be able to make use of that even from your monthly subscription windows 12.

                btw, there is zfs for windows too. but yeah the other way is easier, only more laborious.

                • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I don’t care what Windows uses, but you think windows would actually support another format? They’ve used NTFS forever, and ReFS hadn’t really taken of despite its intro around server 2012 & windows 8. Sure it has WSL but idk they’ll support ZFS that much.

                  I have been relieved they started supporting the open document format in recent Microsoft 365 desktop software.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            No, flash is not more resilient and durable. They’re not made to stay unused for long stretches of time, they suffer the same issues as SSDs.

            https://www.howtogeek.com/drives-discs-and-sticks-which-storage-media-has-the-longest-lifespan/

            HDDs when plugged in can give you warnings if something is not looking good, giving you time to get the data off it and get a new backup. An SSD or flash drive however will just drop dead without warning.

            • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              They certainly can give you warnings, sure. If its something the drive can detect. Too many times, the articulating arm inside will hang up and tick as it moves back and forth, causing the disk to never initialize and therefore is dead. Other times, I’ve had to buy PCB boards on eBay to try and salvage a drive that has a power issue.

              I’ve got SSDs from 2011 (Kingston hyper X 120GB’s) that were configured in RAID0 and ran from 2011 when I was beta testing Windows 8 until I upgraded to bigger drives in 2016. I needed some data off of those a few years ago maybe 2023/24 and hooked them up, they not only ran just fine, but still showed 96% integrity or life span or whatever.

              I’ve had HDDs that were 100% functional and then stored in a plastic bin, in my basement that’s heated/cooled and humidity controlled, and hook them up and just don’t read at all.

              I’ve been in IT for about 20 years (professionally at least) and seen all sorts of weird things happen to mechanical drives, and would trust data being burned to a DVD-R at 8.5GB per double layer disc over HDDs for long term storage. As a matter of fact, I’ve got an old 256MB micro SD card from one of my first smart phones that I bet still has photos on it from the 1.3MP camera.

              • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                I’ve been in IT professionally for longer, and I’ve seen and experienced far more flash drives and SSDs just drop dead than HDDs without warning.

                This isn’t controversial btw. You can google it, ask professional backup companies, etc. Drives that depend on holding a charge, which degrades over time, are not recommended for long term storage because long term storage is a known issue with them. They’re the wrong tool for the job.

                No, HDDs will not always alert to impending failure - but SSDs and flash drives never will. Which do you think is preferable, “not always” or “never”.

                Also when a mechanical drive fails you can usually fix it and recover your data. With flash/ssds, again, you never can.

                As for burning to discs, yeah that’s even safer - but not generally viable due to the tiny amount of data they store, and the fact that basically no one has disc drives anymore.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Back your stuff up is good advice, in case the worst happens, but nothing beats physical books your kids can look through.

      in an age where people are constantly renting because they cannot afford to have their own place, digital backups could be longer living though.