wtf

Edit: Apparently this is satire or an art project

  • XPost3000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    This type of extravagant technological solution feels like something Aperture Science would make

  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    y’all mfs trying to detect obvious satire challenge (impossible)

  • Connor717@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a shame so many people are being so annoying with AI. There are so many genuinely incredible possibilities.

    • limeaide@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why does every tech bro want to replace things thay make people happy, like art with AI?? It’s so confusing tbh

      I thought things like low level customer service or menial tasks would make sense to replace first

      • Spacebar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because they don’t have the artistic skill themselves and they are parasitic by nature? So they latch onto a tool that itself is a parasite?

    • 🕷️ Spider Tax 🕷️@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      agreed. in the case of AI art, there are some legitimate artists out there (Rob Sheridan comes to mind) who are making wonderful use of AI image generation tools and incorporating it into their artwork and it’s SO cool.

      it’s a shame that so far the loudest people touting AI are the annoying “bro buy my latest shitcoin” techbros.

  • Npenplz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t imagine anyone other than tech bros actually using this in any scenario

    • MrsEaves@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI image generation aside, this sort of thing might be genuinely useful for someone who is blind or low vision. It’s like alt text for the world.

  • Erose543@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to capture the thing I’m looking at. Art is an attempt to convey personal experience to another person with an unknowable other experience. Having the basis of art be other people’s art without at least personal control of the end composition is just all backwards. Not to mention that’s not a camera, it’s literally a different thing. These people get me so flustered

  • TheBelgian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    actually, Google was really working on something like this, based on googlestreet images, gps, accelerometer, time, AI etc… to deduce the image and sell cameraless smartphone.

    what a stupid idea, honestly

    1. because it is indeed stupid: the most inefficient way to provide an existing and cheap feature
    2. cameras are actually the selling point of most the expensive smartphone
    3. I WANT to capture it myself
  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks like a lot of unnecessary extra steps for worse effect.

    It is incredibly ironic though because back in the days photography was attacked as the thing that would “destroy art”.