• Peter1986C@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Most SBCs would be too large to fit inside headphones, lol. And tbh, I do not get the RPI hate that pops up in a lot of places recently.

    • altair222@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      they hired a surveillance officer, disgustingly trolled people trying to raise concern over it, their CEO said that the fediverse was using discord to run a hate campaign against the organization.

      • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        the fediverse was using discord to run a hate campaign against the organization

        Why do I doubt that if the Fediverse was going to run a hate campagin, they’d use Discord

        • Peter1986C@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          There probably are many reasons to doubt the likelyhood of using Discord, lol.

          Then again, what query would I have to use on Searx (or any other search engine) to find more info whether any official from the Pi Foundation would have made those claims in the first place?

      • Peter1986C@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not sure on the veracity of all that, but I doubt that a company (or rather their PR team) would “troll” people.

          • Peter1986C@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I have read some news on it a while ago and I still think everything got a bit overblown. I do not remember at this point ( I got bigger stuff to care about RN, like possibly most of us do right now), but was that officer not even actually hired but rather a community contributor instead? Plus, surveillance does not have to be against citizens but could also be against organised crime rings. I do understand that cops can be proverbial bastards (especially in the US and certain developing nations and dictatorships), but are some activists and netizens not overreacting a bit?

            And what is your reply* for kind of comment anyway, after your showcase of maturity (/s) when calling something more akin to a potential (massive) PR blunder, “trolling”.

            *Your “have it your way” remark.