• Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The gun rights y’all have?

    Now, most people would tell you that Gun Control Works and that you should just do that and get less dead kids per month which is a generally good thing.

    … But here’s another thing to consider. As long as you’re allowed to purchase weapons for cheap and easy.

    You do realise you can in fact do something about the assholes in your government and your oligarchies with those guns, right? That they can be used for more than just killing children?

    Luigi Mangione seemed to get it.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    A while ago I watched a live stream of CSPAN (I think?) where the House failed to form a government for several consecutive days. The way the entire process started with a prayer, and the many references to religion throughout, is just as disturbing as the personality cult around Stalin. That whole gang is fucked in the head.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Where to begin…

    But I’ll touch on something no one else has here.

    Shopping carts. It’s mindblowing to me that the country that sent men to the moon still hasn’t figured out that its easier for everyone if they turn on all 4 wheels rather than the 2 front ones.

    That way you can slide your cart sideways to make room for other shoppers. And turning it takes no effort.

    And even… even if it is some weird cost cutting thing. Why not make them turn on the rear wheels? That would still make it easier than in the front. Since you steer the cart from the rear.

    Get your shit together. Put gun controll aside, put your dumb ass two party politics aside and focus on what matters. Your godawful shopping carts.

  • TheV2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The USA is neither the best country nor the worst country. It’s just one of the countries.

  • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ok another thing people haven’t really touched on is government restrictions on dangerous shit generally. I’m not just talking about guns, but also cars. When I was in the states I saw so many car accidents and bits of car on the road. That doesn’t need to happen. It turns out that if you have proper driving tests and mandatory classes, people don’t crash as much. Same with guns though. Owning a gun is fine if you learn how to properly use and store it.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      136
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Many, if not most, of us are jealous of other countries, though. Really, this is only a hard truth for the MAGA crowd, and even that is (I think) largely the fault of the nationalist propaganda that’s been shoveled at us since we were kids.

      As an American, I agree with you, though - the US is in no way a ‘strong democracy’, or much of a democracy at all. It may once have been, but it certainly hasn’t been the case for a long time.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        72
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Back in 1780s the US constitution was an absolute marvel of progressiveness, but today, it is increadibly outdated and keeps the US political system back from making progress.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            6 days ago

            But we’re really a used car salesman trying to get you to finance a clapped out Nissan Altima with 128k miles, failing clear coat, and a dented bumper.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      No shit, what American thinks either are true?

      America, fuck yeah!

      Has been a joke for like 30 years now

        • MrVilliam@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          56
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          This. Conservatives have poor media literacy. They don’t understand that they’re the punchline in stuff like that. They miss the point of stuff like RoboCop and Starship Troopers and unironically like those movies for the action and don’t even recognize the social commentary. They watched Team America and guffawed into their 24 packs of light beer at every shallow joke without recognizing that the jokes were intentionally shallow to point out what an idiot would think is a good joke. It’s like the TV show in Idiocracy. The real joke is below the surface.

          • Maiq@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            45
            ·
            7 days ago

            I used to watch Colbert Report with my dad and it took him years to realize that it was a parody mocking him often personally. My dad was not a dumb man. The conservative bubble is hard to pop. Its like a Stockholm syndrome victim sympathizing with their attacker.

            • Archer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              It blows my mind that when Colbert got his new job he had people coming up to him for years saying they liked his old show better.

              They liked his old show, The Colbert Report, better. When it was clearly satire.

              • amorpheus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                His old show was better. But I can’t imagine it working well any more, when reality is already so absurd.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Literally the opposite…

          Where are you see conservatives talking about how great America has been under Bidnen?

          Like, you put zero thinking into your comment, just like you assume the people you’re “dunking on” do.

          You’re a different side of the same coin, that’s never meant opposites, you’re th same thing.

          Just neither sid bis smart enough to figure it out, and both think only the other side is dumb

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The irony is rooted in reality, much like the stereotypes.

        I’ve received quite a few hostile reactions when critiquing the US, including idiocy like “FU we have a bigger military” from blowhards.

        There are, unfortunately, enough bad apples to spoil the bushel.

    • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Believe me there’s no shortage of people who know that were not the shining city on the hill, unfortunately we’re drowned out by pandering patriotic country music and gunfire from mass shootings.

      • JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        I like the clip, but IMO they basically bailed out in the end by all the nonsense quoted from the ~3:25 mark on.

        Jeff basically makes it sound like the US used to be incredibly self-aware, humble, kind, and well-administrated, but I think what most Americans don’t choose to understand is that since the very settling of the continent, it’s been a highly fraught, contentious situation, much of it characterised by greed, cruelty, violence, intolerance and self-righteousness.

        Now yes, from what I understand of history, under FDR we more or less hit a peak of being a well-run, progressive country, on the level of many modern Euro countries more or less, but most of that was specifically in response to the utter disaster of the Great Depression and the need to adjust powerfully, swiftly and accurately. Meanwhile, IIRC during his presidency, there was in fact a right-wing movement intending to remove him by underhanded means.

        So I like the hopefulness of the clip, but in the end I also find it pretty typical of Americans being largely unwilling to understand the hows and whys of the nation, going back to the early 1600’s.

        Eh, sorry for the dang essay. :S

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      What? We have two right wing parties to choose from! Is that not enough? Should we make three right wing parties so you feel we are better represented?

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    The level of uneducation in the US is a threat to the entire species. Most of Ylyour people are uneducated, fat and dangerous. After the last election, I have lost hope in the US as a collectivity, you deserve your unfair system because you chose it. You elected a convict rapist, fellon, racist, fat billionaire who doesn’t pay taxes and tried to steal the election, your deserve to be treated the way you will be, you made a choice.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    258
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Gasoline prices are heavily subsidized in the US, the gas price you complain about is cheap compared to other countries.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The commodity price for gasoline right now looks to be about 2 USD per gallon. Retail gasoline in the USA is at least a dollar more due to taxes and markup.

      Subsidies may play a role as well, but the taxes in some countries are extreme by American standards. My take on it is that a fuel tax is effectively neutral if it brings in enough revenue to pay for the road system.

      • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The fuel tax isn’t enough to cover the damage to the environment and quality of life, though. That’s why taxes are that high in many other places. Same way cigarettes are taxed to help discourage use and to help cover the increased healthcare costs it puts on everyone

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Fuel, and other car-related taxes (sometimes based on horsepower or engine displacement) in most countries in Europe were much higher than in the USA long before there was widespread concern about the environmental impact of cars.

          • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Which is why I said “environment and quality of life” - they don’t want their cities dominated by cars (making life dangerous for pedestrians) and for cars to become a requirement for living. So taxes are added to discourage (not eliminate) driving and car ownership

            But also, the mess of smog from exhaust and other impacts beyond climate change have been known since the first automobiles. Concerns about the ‘environment’ is more than greenhouse gasses.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        6 days ago

        In NZ it’s roughly $2.50NZD per litre minimum, or $5.31USD per gallon. This is roughly 50% tax (it’s how we pay for roads, plus is subject to sales tax), so a bit over $2USD per gallon at the moment excluding tax.

        Is it really $3 a gallon plus tax in the US right now?

        I compare it to how I thought mobile phone calls in the US were super cheap, then found out people pay to receive calls, which was super weird to me. Where I live, my whole life it has never been the case that a normal residential connection would pay to receive a call, mobile or not.

        Differences in how we do things make differences appear more than they are.

        • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s $3/gal total including taxes here in Illinois right now.

          I was in California last week and it was $4.50/gam total

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Taxes throw things out because everyone does it different. What are the sans-tax prices?

            • gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I don’t know if anyone can really get you that number, because the tax isn’t clearly disclosed when you buy gasoline, it’s just included in the price; the taxes also vary widely between different states/counties/maybe cities too?

              Edit: the federal tax is $0.184 per gallon

              • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                6 days ago

                I can, Spain only has federal tax and it’s 21% for anything premium like gasoline.

                1.63€ per litre with taxes.
                So 6.169€ per gallon with taxes.
                Or 6.29$ per gallon post tax.
                Or 5.2$ per gallon without tax.

                Literally more than double their price, and they complain so hard LMAO.

              • Dave@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Huh, the US gets another layer more confusing. Tax is included in gas prices but not in anything else? How do the arguments for not including that tax in the price stack up when gas stations are already including it?

                • davidgro@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Tradition.

                  Gas prices are also the only retail prices that include tenths of a penny - specifically 9/10, as in all gas prices look like $x.xx9 such as $3.059

                • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Even more annoying, the gas price really has 99/100ths tacked on, so the price is a cent more expensive because no one thinks of it.

                  Ie: $3/gal is really charged as $3.0099/gal

              • Dave@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Ok apparently Illinois has a 39c per gallon gasoline tax, another 18c in federal, and another 6% or so on state sales tax, plus any regional sales tax. It’s unclear whether the sales tax applies to the gasoline tax (in NZ it does), but let’s assume it doesn’t. Then that’s $3 - 0.39 - 0.18 = $2.43 then remove 6% tax is 2.43/106*100 = $2.29

                We can probably knock a bit more off because there is probably some regional/city sales tax but it should be the right ballpark.

                It does seem we pay about the same for petrol, though from what I’ve been searching up, this is wildly different across states because states have much different ways of paying for roads (e.g. Hawai’i is mostly taxed at the pump where as Alaska has big taxes on oil extraction to keep taxes for residents low, including for roading).

                • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Sales tax is either included already or not charged.

                  The posted price is the posted price, no additional taxes on top of it.

                  Although they add 99/100ths to the price, so $3.00/gal is really charged at $3.0099/gal.

                  Of course this gets rounded up 😒

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Any price lower than that required to compensate for all the negative externalities of both driving and using fossil fuels to do it still counts as subsidized.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          A failure to set an excise tax on a product or service that offsets its externalities is not a subsidy. A lower tax rate than a competing product is arguably a subsidy.

          I’m not aware of any modern societies that make a credible attempt to adjust the price of all or most goods and services to include their externalities. That sounds like a good idea in theory, but very difficult to implement in practice.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Fuel tax in the U.S. doesn’t even come close to paying for the road system. The federal fuel tax covers less than half of federal transportation spending. I don’t know about all of the states, but Wisconsin’s fuel tax covers only about 2/3 of the road spending. And, local streets get built with local property and income taxes.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        The fuel tax in other countries primarily exists to make people use less fuel in order to save the world from global warming.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          That’s probably not true, but hard to calculate.

          The previous time I looked, which was a while ago, federal fuel tax revenue in the USA and federal highway expenditures were about equal. Since then, fuel tax revenue has fallen behind highway spending; the required increase to even it out would be modest in absolute terms - something like 15 cents per gallon. States each have their own taxes and budgets, of course.

          As for the road damage each car causes, it increases (roughly) proportional to the fourth power of vehicle weight. Semi trucks and similar heavy commercial vehicles cause almost all of the traffic-induced road wear, and passenger cars contribute very little. It’s likely the fuel taxes paid for a passenger car (even a relatively large one) are several times its marginal impact on road maintenance.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        What state do you live in that the road system is funded adequately? I never hear someone comment positively about the general state of road conditions.

        • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Adequately is a difficult determination.

          Is it adequate if there are state maintained dirt roads? In some states, the state or county chooses not to pave all of their roads.

          Is it adequately funded if they have potholes? Due to weather conditions, some states are notorious for potholes.

          Is it adequately funded if the road gets washed out or carried away by flooding? California gets mudslides that take out sections of roads, other states get sinkholes or hurricanes/tornados destroying their roads

          How long can one of these issues plague a road before we consider them underfunded?

          My opinion is that the US has too many roads. Most roads are maintained by county or municipalities, and are funded through infinite growth model.

          When a developer creates a new subdivision, they pave the roads. Once done, they usually relinquish these roads to the county/city who are responsible for maintaining the roads.

          Typically maintenance is low until they require replacing. The cities and counties don’t save money or plan well for replacing these roads and rely on new tax revenue to fund replacing them.

          It builds a slowly ballooning road maintenance cost that someone will have to pay. I believe someone made a video about this very fact. I don’t have the link handy

        • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Florida, with the tourist money and gas taxes all our roads and highways are solid. The great weather year round means they can maintain and build roads all the time non stop.

  • letsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Gun control works.

    And OK maybe it doesn’t solve the problem 100%, but it solves it 99%, and that’s a lot of schoolkids that aren’t dead any more. Look at any first world country for working examples; I’m in the UK, and yes we still have some gun violence, but it’s a whole load less than it would have otherwise been.

    And it’s incredibly short sighted to reject any solution that doesn’t solve a problem 100%. Partial solutions are good.